Poster Presentation New Zealand Association of Plastic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting

Gracillis interposition flap for colo-urinary fistula reconstruction post radical prostatectomy: Case series review of literature (1602)

Minhao Hu 1 , Michael Thomson 1
  1. Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia

Introduction: Urinary fistulas are uncommon but debilitating complications post prostatectomy, presenting with pneumaturia, fecaluria and urochezia and occurring in 0.6 to 9 % of cases(1). “Conservative” management involves urinary and fecal diversion, although resolution rates are low- one study demonstrating a closure rate of 33% with catheterization and colostomy alone (2); surgical repair is thus often mandated in cases of failure. Various approaches are described- transperineal, transrectal, transsphincteric, and transanorectal. Common techniques for repair post fistula excision include direct layered closure, mucosal flaps, buccal mucosal grafts and interposition with pedicled locoregional tissue: including gracillis, omentum, rectus abdominus, dartos or levator.  We describe 2 cases of pedicled gracillis interposition for post prostatectomy urinary fistula reconstruction. 

Discussion and Review of literature

Outcomes of this technique have been reported in several series. Munoz-Duyos et al reported 9 cases in post-prostatectomy rectrourethral fistula with successful healing in all patients with 54 months median follow up (3). Bislengi et al. reported on 52 patients with acquired rectourethral fistulas, Gracillis interposition in this cohort approached 90% closure rates (4). A systematic review of rectourethral fistula repair techniques reported that most high volume centres (>25 patients) use tissue interposition flaps (5). 

Conclusions

Gracillis interposition flap is a well described, safe and reliable method for post-prostatectomy urinary fistula reconstruction, providing well vascularized locoregional musculature with minimal donor site morbidity.

  1. 1. Harpster LE, Rommel FM, Sieber PR, et al. The incidence and management of rectal injury associated with radical prostatectomy in a community based urology practice. Journal of Urology. 1995;154(4):1435–1438
  2. 2. Thomas C, Jones J, Jäger W, Hampel C, Thüroff JW, Gillitzer R. Incidence, clinical symptoms and management of rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology. 2010;183(2):608–612.
  3. 3. Muñoz-Duyos A, Navarro-Luna A, Pardo-Aranda F, Caballero JM, Borrat P, Maristany C, Pando JA, Veloso E. Gracilis Muscle Interposition for Rectourethral Fistula After Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective Evaluation and Long-term Follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):393-398.
  4. 4. Bislenghi G, Verstraeten L, Verlinden I, Castiglione F, Debaets K, Van der Aa F, Fieuws S, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A, Joniau S. Surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistula: a retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):927-933.
  5. 5. Hechenbleikner EM, Buckley JC, Wick EC. Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):374-83.